Spirit Of Gandhian Philosophy

It is the religious and social ideas adopted andtruthful path. Though they were rooted in the
developed by Gandhi, first during his period inhighest idealism, the experiments were carried out
South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later ofon a very down-to-earth plane - India's moral,
course in India.political and social needs as he saw them. Such an
Introductionapproach is available to all at all time. Gandhi
The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought arebelieved his own moral and spiritual development
truth and nonviolence: the ultimate station Gandhito be far from complete at the time of his death.
assigns nonviolence stems from two main points.Despite the great heights he had attained, this
First, if according to the Divine Reality all life iswas indeed true. He had not achieved perfection,
one, then all violence committed towards anotheras some of those who were close to him have
is violence towards oneself, towards thetestified. 
collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructiveThe perception of what is the truthful path is
and counter to the universal law of life, which islargely a matter for the individual's reason and
love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is theconscience, which therefore play key roles. The
most powerful force in existence. Had has-beenindividual should subject each idea to the test of
superior to ahimsa, humankind would long agohis or her own conscience and reason. Reason
have succeeded in destroying itself. The humanand rationality have enormous roles to play in the
race certainly could not have progressed as farGandhian way of thinking. This, I feel, is one of
as it has, even if universal justice remains far offthe major Western influences in Gandhi. If there is
the horizon. From both viewpoints, nonviolence orgenuine, sincere disagreement, an idea can be
love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.discarded. However, once a principle is accepted a
As a guide to action, Gandhian philosophy is asincere attempt must be made to adhere to it.
double-edged weapon. Its objective is toIdeally there should be harmony between thought,
transform the individual and society simultaneouslyword and action. In this way the outer life
(rather than in sequence, as Marxism describes), inbecomes a true reflection of the inner, and a
accordance with the principles of truth andmental harmony is also achieved.
nonviolence. The historic task before humankind isThe remaining central concept in Gandhi's
to progress towards the creation of a nonviolentphilosophy is Satyagraha. Defined most broadly
political, economic and social order by nonviolent(as Gandhi defined it), Satyagraha is itself a whole
struggle. The social goal was described by Gandhiphilosophy of nonviolence. Defined most narrowly,
as Sarvodaya, a term he coined in paraphrasingit is a technique or tool of nonviolent action.
John Ruskin's book Unto This Last, meaning theBecause of the intention here to keep this
welfare of all without exception. Its political aspectdiscussion as simple as possible, Satyagraha will be
was expressed by the late eminent Gandhian Drdescribed here in its latter guise. As a technique,
R.R. Diwakar in the following words: "The good ofSatyagraha was developed by Gandhi in South
each individual in society Consists in his efforts toAfrica to give the Indian population there a
achieve the good of all."weapon with which to resist the injustices being
Economic decentralisation, to prevent massiveperpetrated upon it by the colonial government.
concentrations of economic power in the hands ofButSatyagraha can be practiced in any cultural
too few, and again, to distribute it in the hands ofenvironment - provided the necessary ingredients
many. Therefore villages, which are anywayare present, not least Satyagrahis (those capable
geographically decentralised, become the basicof Satyagraha). A Satyagraha campaign is
economic units. However, where unavoidable,undertaken only after all other peaceful means
certain industries may be organised on a morehave proven ineffective. At its heart is
centralised basis, and their ownership and controlnonviolence. An attempt is made to convert,
come under the umbrella of the State.persuade or win over the opponent. It involves
The minimisation of competition and exploitation inapplying the forces of both reason and conscience
the economic sphere, and instead, thesimultaneously. While holding aloft the indisputable
encouragement of cooperation.truth of his or her position, the Satyagrahi also
Production on the basis of need rather thanengages in acts of voluntary self-suffering. Any
greed, concentrating where India is concernedviolence inflicted by the opponent is accepted
first on the eradication of poverty (and on thewithout retaliation. But precisely because there is
worst extreme of poverty).Recognition of theno retaliation (which can make the opponent feel
dignity of labour and the greater purity of ruralhis violence is justified), the opponent can only
life. The practice of extensive self-reliance bybecome morally bankrupt if violence continues to
individuals, villages, regions and the nation.be inflicted indefinitely.  
Absence of oppression on the basis of race,Several methods can be applied in a Satyagraha
caste, class, language, gender or religion. A deepcampaign, primarily non-cooperation and fasting.
respect for mother nature, necessitating anThe action is undertaken in the belief in the
economic system based upon the preservationunderlying goodness of the opponent, and in his or
rather than destruction of the naturalher ability to acknowledge the injustice of the
environment. Such concepts clearly representaction and to cease the injustice, or at least to
pillars for a new social order. A theory closelycompromise. Satyagraha in this sense is highly
linked to the concept of Sarvodaya, alsocreative. It creates no enemies, hatred or lasting
developed by Gandhi, is that of Trusteeship. Itsbitterness, but ultimately only mutual regard. After
fundamental objective is to create nonviolent anda successful campaign there is not the least hint
non-exploitative property relationships. Gandhiof gloating, nor is there any desire to embarrass
believed that the concepts of possession andthe opponent. The former opponent becomes a
private property were sources of violence, and infriend. There are no losers, only winners. A
contradiction with the Divine reality that all wealthtruthful Satyagraha campaign, though it demands
belongs to all people. However, he recognised thatcourage, self-discipline and humility on the part of
the concept of ownership would not wither easily,the Satyagrahi, brings to bear tremendous moral
nor would the wealthy be easily persuaded topressure on the opponent and can bring about
share their wealth. Therefore a compromise wasremarkable transformations. Two factors are
to encourage the wealthy to hold their wealth inabsolutely crucial to understand. There can be no
trust, to use themselves only what wasSatyagraha in a cause which is not indisputably
necessary and toallow the remainder to be utilizedjust and truthful. Nor can there be any element of
for the benefit of the whole society.violence or bitterness in a Satyagraha campaign -
Gandhi's thought is equally a philosophy ofit must be conducted in a spirit of genuine
self-transformation. The individual's task is tononviolence. Any campaign which is insincere in its
make a sincere attempt to live according to thespirit of nonviolence, or is not undertaken in a
principles of truth and nonviolence. Its fundamentalclearly just cause is not Satyagraha as Gandhi
tenets are therefore moral. They include -meant it.
resisting injustice, developing a spirit of service,To sum up, Gandhian philosophy is not only
selflessness and sacrifice, emphasising one'ssimultaneously political, moral and religious; it is also
responsibilities rather than rights, self-discipline,traditional and modern, simple and complex. It
simplicity of life-style, and attempting to maintainembodies numerous Western influences to which
truthful and nonviolent relations with others. ItGandhi was exposed, but being rooted in ancient
should be understood that by simplicity is meantIndian culture and harnessing eternal and universal
voluntary simplicity, not poverty, which has nomoral and religious principles, there is much in it
element of voluntarism in it. If there is one thingthat is not at all new. This is why Gandhi could
Gandhi does not stand for, it is poverty. Asay: "I have nothing new to teach the world.
Gandhian should also avoid political office. He orTruth and nonviolence are as old as the hills."
she should remain aloof from formal party politicsGandhi is concerned even more with the spirit
and equi-distant from all political groupings. But thisthan with the form. If the spirit is consistent with
is not to say, and in my view Gandhi does nottruth and nonviolence, the truthful and nonviolent
require, that the individual should remain aloofform will automatically result. Despite its
from all politics. For often injustice cannot beanti-Westernism, many hold its outlook to be
resisted unless the political power holders andultra-modern, in fact ahead of its time - even far
structures are engaged, nonviolently.ahead. Perhaps the philosophy is best seen as a
For the individual self-transformation is attemptedharmonious blend of the traditional and modern.
with deliberateness rather than with haste. OneThe multifaceted nature of Gandhi's thought also
should not seek to become a Mahatma overnight,can easily lead to the view that it is extremely
because such attempts will surely fail, but tocomplex. Perhaps in one sense it is. One could
reform oneself over the whole of one's life, aseasily write volumes in describing it! Yet Gandhi
far as one is capable. (Nor should there be anydescribed much of his thought as mere
question of superficial imitation of Gandhi.) Gandhicommonsense. Dr Diwakar sums up Gandhi's
viewed his own life as a process of developmentthought in a few words: "The four words, truth,
undertaken "one step at a time". He saw thenonviolence, Sarvodaya and Satyagraha and their
need to continually "experiment with truth" (fromsignificance constitute Gandhi and his teaching."
which he derived the title of his autobiography) inThese are indeed the four pillars of Gandhian
whatever field, in order to come to see thethought.