| PREAMBLE | | | | most of them utilized concepts from both (a) and |
| Time and again spirited discussions take place on | | | | (b) streams. There seemed to be a few other |
| internet fora pertaining to an examination of the | | | | individuals who totally denied the veracity of |
| status of a variety of jyotish parameters, | | | | thought stream (b) and a few were a bit taciturn |
| including chara dasha (a sign based planetary | | | | about it, perhaps to avoid acrimony and getting |
| period astrofactor) and karakamsha (the | | | | ensnared in the controversy. Or perhaps there |
| navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most | | | | were some other reasons, known only to them. |
| advanced planet in longitude) is placed. As | | | | WHAT DO THE JYOTISH CLASSICS OPINE: |
| characteristically happens, some of the | | | | While the purists and historians duke it out as to |
| discussants began to branch into other side | | | | what constitutes a Classic and what not, there |
| discussions which really had nothing to do with the | | | | seemed to be no significant resistance to |
| original questions or topics and some even | | | | accepting Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra, |
| became a bit exercised and emotional, as also | | | | described - by a very accomplished and brilliant, |
| often happens on the internet where attention | | | | jyotishi who is an excellent writer and teacher and |
| spans of days and weeks are required in order to | | | | a very wise person beyond his years - as ... a |
| get to the bottom of things and where | | | | remarkably well-preserved and reasonably intact, |
| sometimes a topic is being discussed on many | | | | well-organized compendium of Jyotish knowledge. |
| different boards and many topics simultaneously | | | | So I spent a few minutes going through it after |
| on a given board! As too is typical, nothing was | | | | Chapter 5 was brought to our attention as a |
| really resolved, and some of the regulars began | | | | strong indication of bhavas only being considered |
| expressing their frustrations about these topics | | | | in rashi and in none of the other vargas since the |
| coming up again and again and directing people to | | | | Sage had not explicitly stated so. On the surface, |
| archives etc. Unfortunately, the yahoo forums | | | | this indeed seemed to be the case! However a |
| fora are such that only limited searching of past | | | | further stroll into the magnum opus brought me |
| messages is possible without losing all of one's | | | | to the chapter on Karakamshas In this Chapter |
| hair, and the archives sometimes are maintained | | | | 35 (Karakamshaphalaadhyaaya), BPHS describes |
| on another yahoo site so this does not help | | | | the effects of planets that are in 2nd or 5th from |
| matters when all one wants is to get a quick | | | | karakamsha (sloka 30-31 for instance) and other |
| summary of what others are using and if possible | | | | houses also from karakamsha in subsequent |
| their reasons for adopting a certain position! This | | | | slokas. Additionally, in sloka 33 BPHS mentions |
| latter usually brings out more gall than good | | | | about the aspects (drishti) of Moon and Venus on |
| information even though the intention of the | | | | the 4th from karakamsha and also in sloka 13. |
| person posing the question may have been very | | | | Now, here lies the quandary |
| noble and not at all confrontational. Knowing | | | | BPHS has, to the best of my understanding, not |
| Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring | | | | clarified if the karakamsha kundali is to be read in |
| Neurotic traits! | | | | the navamsha arrangement or the rashi |
| Somewhere, along the path of this former quest, | | | | arrangement (even though in both case the |
| another topic got born and began questioning the | | | | karakamsha sign will be taken from the navamsha |
| use of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional | | | | where AK is placed). Modern jyotishis are split |
| horoscopes which are the core of jyotish and | | | | over this matter. |
| have also been used by tropical astrologers in the | | | | This, therefore, will be the deciding factor. If you |
| form of harmonic charts. Now this is something | | | | see planetary arrangements for the karakamsha |
| that is utilized in Jyotish going back to almost the | | | | chart in rashi after finding the seed orientation |
| first memories of even the oldest members in | | | | (atmakaraka in navamsha), then you would say |
| the forum who eventually admitted to such being | | | | that the above citation in BPHS does not clarify or |
| the case. I myself, though myself not that senior, | | | | indicate the use of varga kundali or of bhavas in |
| have seen horoscopes that were drawn in the | | | | sub-rashi vargas. On the other hand, if you |
| century before last where the jyotishi had drawn | | | | continue to use the navamsha positions of other |
| the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha | | | | planets for the karakamsha examination, then |
| and so on and more importantly had commented | | | | there lies the less explicit (than Chapter 5) but |
| on these charts in his reading. So, at least some | | | | important recommendation that houses matter |
| individuals had been utilizing varga-charts even a | | | | and should be studied in vargas. By extrapolation, |
| couple of hundred years ago and conceivably | | | | as in the navamsha, so in the dashamsa and the |
| perhaps even prior to these times. | | | | remaining 13 (Rashi having being unequivocally |
| Somewhere during the discussion, in one of the | | | | accepted as suitable for studying houses in a |
| lists, one of the members made available an | | | | horoscopic manner: Chapter 5, BPHS!). However, |
| article in which the author had expressed thoughts | | | | there still was no evidence or classical indication |
| to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be used in | | | | for the use of drishtis in amsha varga kundalis. A |
| a chart format. A discussion ensued which | | | | case was made about it "just not being |
| sidestepped the more important and pertinent | | | | astronomically correct" because drishtis were |
| matter of the practical merits of using of | | | | based on angular distances (even though Vedic |
| navamsha varga as a secondary chart. A few | | | | drishtis are more lax in orbs than their western |
| individuals asked for proofs in classics that | | | | tropical astrology counterparts, but angular all the |
| indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga | | | | same). There was more searching that needed to |
| chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY | | | | be done, obviously! |
| rashi chakra must be used and varga placements | | | | At this juncture, someone mentioned that Kalyan |
| should only be used for determining the strengths | | | | Varma, the jyotishi king was a reputable source |
| of planets etc. | | | | and had dealt with navamshas in a brilliant manner |
| Now, those who have studied BPHS would know, | | | | and had not recommended the use of varga |
| that 16 vargas had been defined by the Sage | | | | kundali. It was indeed a cue from the Universe! |
| starting with rashi ehich is also known as 'kshetra' | | | | My next focus of attention was - Saravali, a text |
| (field or area) and so on. One of the members | | | | that I absolutely love! Anyways, I recalled |
| brought to all astrologers' attention that Parashara | | | | something in Saravali that I was a bit bothered by |
| had described very clearly how to determine | | | | early on during my Jyotish learning. Indeed, soon I |
| bhavas in the rashi chart (ascendant, 10th house | | | | was looking at Chapters 22 onwards where |
| and then trisection of the arcs, etc. in Chapter V | | | | effects of drishtis between planets were |
| of BPHS). This was indeed true and a positive | | | | mentioned by Kalyan Varma. |
| step forward in the discussion. There were parallel | | | | Before I got into it, though, I needed to make |
| discussions going on which were rehashing the | | | | sure what a drishti means to jyotishis. Most |
| point that BPHS was not original and was perhaps | | | | jyotishis writing in English use the term 'aspects' |
| not even a classic and written by one or a group | | | | for drishtis, just like their tropical brethren. |
| of 'latter day saints' [my term, not the original | | | | However, there are some differences. |
| poster's!] in Jyotish and therefore cannot be | | | | Conjunction is an aspect, however yugma or |
| treated as a classic. Obviously, there was some | | | | more specifically yuti (coming together of planets) |
| support for this as could be similarly expected if | | | | is not a drishti. Several references in |
| someone were to make a comment that Jyotish | | | | Satyacharya's writings mention "Yuto Drishto" and |
| was nothing but a derivative of Babylonian | | | | other grammatical forms of these two terms. |
| astrology that the army that came with | | | | Now Satyacharya is economical in the use of |
| Alexander brought to India. A topic that has been | | | | words, if nothing else. He would not use two |
| known to bring even sedate jyotishis out on the | | | | words that mean the same thing next to each |
| "war-path!" | | | | other. This then would imply that Yuti |
| To those who were still interested and intrigued | | | | (conjunction) is separate from Drishti (aspect) in |
| by this, there seemed to be two streams of | | | | Jyotish parlance. Yuti is not drishti, though the |
| thought prevailing: | | | | effect or influence might be similar. |
| (a) Only Rashi horoscopes should be used. Other | | | | Next, looking into the mathematical consideration |
| varga kundalis were the product of corrupted | | | | of drishti in drig bala, conjunctions do not come |
| understanding of the classics - which themselves | | | | into consideration when determining aspect |
| many concur might not have survived in pure | | | | strengths. In fact the planets have to be greater |
| form [though some of them have thankfully | | | | than 2 signs in order to get a aspect strength |
| survived in reasonably good shape1]. Underlying | | | | value. This allows an unambiguous cuff of |
| this is the belief some may harbor that, alike the | | | | separation between two planets and yuti or |
| iceberg, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of the total | | | | conjunction not getting aspect strength at all. An |
| body while the submerged 9/10th is mostly lost | | | | indirect but important confirmation that |
| and partly hidden in the secret chambers of | | | | conjunction is not meant when ancient jyotishis |
| paramparas and some of the secret documents | | | | referred to 'drishti'. |
| that exist but jealously guarded by the custodian | | | | How come, then, Kalyan Varma in several slokas |
| families. I do not know how much of this iceberg | | | | (e.g., Chap. 22, sloka 6, 7, 14 ..., Chap.26, slokas 25, |
| postulate is based facts and how much is wishful | | | | 29, on and on in similar slokas - talks about |
| fiction. According to the purists of this stream of | | | | effects of drishtis (no mention of conjunctions or |
| thought, vargas MUST only be used as measures | | | | yutis) between Sun and Mercury and Sun and |
| of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets | | | | Venus, and Mercury and Venus? Once or twice |
| and for the consideration of the deities and primal | | | | could have been a mistake or error committed |
| forces those represent BUT not in the form of a | | | | by a dozing student of Kalyan Varma who was |
| horoscope and certainly no serious consideration | | | | taking dictation but there are too many instances |
| must be given to aspects and bhava | | | | there! Now, even a neophyte in astrology would |
| considerations. Just for clarity, they would | | | | agree that Venus and definitely Mercury would |
| maintain, for instance, that while the 2nd house | | | | never get so far from Sun to enter into a drishti |
| lord in navamsha is an important indicator, the | | | | sambandh! UNLESS, obviously, Kalyan Varma was |
| fact that it is placed in the 2nd navamsha varga | | | | not referring to the rashi horoscope but also to |
| from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2nd house | | | | amsha varga horoscopes! Yes, this makes sense!! |
| in navamsha chart) is not significant. Or, for | | | | CONCLUSION: Putting 2 and 2 together - |
| instance, if Mars is in Aries sign and Libra | | | | Parashara indicating house relationships in varga |
| navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra | | | | charts in the karakamsha examination and Kalyan |
| navamsha, the two planets are not related | | | | Varma even more directly and at several places |
| (though they would be depicted as being | | | | referring to something that can be an |
| conjoined in the same navamsha varga in a | | | | astronomical reality only in varga charts - are |
| navamsha chart). | | | | providing firm indication of Jyotish classics |
| (b) Regardless of whether explicitly described or | | | | recommending the use vargas in a kundali, chakra |
| not, the other stream of thinking maintains that | | | | or horoscope form with consideration of bhavas |
| varga kundalis have an important role to play in | | | | as in rashi as well as aspects, or drishtis! |
| Jyotish and possibly are of significant utility in | | | | A good beginning! Now we would all need to study |
| discerning primary mandates matters pertaining to | | | | further and find practical applicability for this |
| the prescription given by sages. In other words, | | | | information. Even more than what has been |
| navamsha chart, for example, would hold a | | | | shown in the past by way of demonstration of |
| significant sway over matters of marriage and | | | | use of varga charts in practical Jyotish. Not so |
| spouse, while saptamsha chart would be of similar | | | | much to convince a few individuals who would |
| import in the examination of children in a given | | | | rather hang on to their pegs of comfort and |
| nativity's reading. These vargas should be | | | | conviction, but to create more light and less |
| examined in a chart format. | | | | smoke in the caverns of Jyotish. A much admired |
| I do not recall anyone in the 'camp (b)' saying that | | | | jyotishi generally signs off his messages with, |
| the first part of (a) is not correct, namely, the | | | | "May Jupiter's light shine on us". To that I would |
| varga positions must be considered, per se, for | | | | like to add, "Maybe we should invite the |
| examination of strength and quality of a planet as | | | | soul-karaka Sun too - for the cavern needs all the |
| prescribed within the Jyotish framework. In fact | | | | light it can get! |